"Between the time when the oceans drank Atlantis and the rise of the sons
of Aryas, there was an age undreamed of. And unto this, Conan, destined
to wear the jeweled crown of Aquilonia upon a troubled brow. It is I,
his chronicler, who alone can tell thee of his saga. Let me tell you of
the days of high adventure!" - Mako
Fantasy films are rarely bold in spirit. Most
of them offer colorful, vivid spectacles in wonderful places, but when
drawing on ancient myth and legend, very few truly recognize that our
history is full of darkness and savagery. In the 1930s, Robert E.
Howard created a legend of his own, channeling all the primal brutality
and bloodshed of the ancient times into one savage hero: Conan, the
Cimmerian who would become a warrior, a pirate, a conqueror, and
eventually a king. Conan's adventures in literature took him across all
corners of the ancient Earth, to battle countless enemies, vicious
monsters, and the darkest magic. Films with this same rawness seem to
only come once in a great while.
1982's cinematic debut of Conan is a welcome break from the
typical sugar-coated fantasy fare; the film doesn't hold back on showing
brutal warfare, liberal bloodshed, rampant sex, and savage landscapes.
Right from the beginning, the savagery is palpable. At the same time,
the film is not all that trashy about it; is uses only as much blood and
gore as it needs to to tell the story. Using only a light amount of
excess, the film progresses through a lengthy adventure full of cool
battles and memorable scenes, with the right pacing and an appropriate
tone that's not too bleak but not too lightweight. As it is, this
incarnation of Conan is fun and awesome to watch, and even after a
sequel, remake, and video game, it hasn't been matched since.
The original stories can get a bit derivative: Conan usually appears
somewhere to slay some bad guys, get the girl, get the treasure, defeat
evil, blah blah blah. This film ventures into the same formulaic
territory, but before doing so, it lays the groundwork by chronicling
Conan's origins, in a tragic opening sequence that's so fundamental in
nature that it's been seen before. From then on, the film maintains a
solid pathos that allows us to follow and root for Conan on his
sprawling quest of vengeance. Conan is a fundamental hero to the core,
and the film expresses all his characteristics - his strength, his
beliefs, his motivations - aptly. The side characters he picks up are
lovable, and their enemies are bad guys we love to hate. The plot is
pieced together using some scenes inspired by the original stories, but
it all flows really well, thanks mostly to the characters and their
chemistry. It's all set in a world that looks primal, but not quite as
dark or magical as the original stories.
This film boasts some good-looking photography. It can be pretty murky
and drab at times, but the camera angles are great and the imagery
overall is solid. Editing has a few weak parts, but is still mostly
good. Acting can be a bit silly, but Arnold Schwarzenegger fits Conan
both in body and spirit. I love Sandahl Bergman's performance as
Valeria. James Earl Jones is literally hypnotic as the main villain,
and everybody else does okay. Writing has a few weak spots, but there
are still quite a few good lines. This production uses some limited,
but very real-looking and detailed sets, props, and costumes. Basil
Poledoris' music score is epic, grand, and a thing of beauty in itself.
Conan the Barbarian is one of the very few epic/fantasy films
that's so raw and brutal, but it's still a fine adventure with lovable
characters and solid plotting. Some may call this film overly violent
or stupid, especially in the way it revels in savagery. But I've always
valued the beauty of savagery, for I believe there is something
compelling about the primal nature of this character. If you enjoy
stuff like this - like the 300 series, the Berserk manga, the God of War video games - then Conan should be a must-see.
On home video, the unrated cut of the movie includes a few bonus scenes
that elaborate a bit more on the characters, but aren't really all that
necessary for the plot.
4.5/5 (Entertainment: Very Good | Story: Very Good | Film: Good)
No comments:
Post a Comment